In June 2003, Quixtar learned that the TV show, Dateline NBC, was doing an investigative story on the business opportunity and Independent Business Owners (IBOs) powered by Quixtar.
We learned that two Dateline producers had registered as Quixtar IBOs and for months had been conducting undercover research for the Dateline story, which included using a hidden camera to videotape meetings and conversations with Quixtar IBOs. The Dateline producers did not identify themselves as working for Dateline, instead feigning interest in building a business powered by Quixtar. In late June, Quixtar was contacted by one of the Dateline producers, seeking response to a handful of questions. In the months since, correspondence with the Dateline producer continued to unveil, bit by bit, issues that might be part of the Dateline Quixtar story.
How we responded to Dateline
To ensure fairness, balance, and accuracy, Quixtar sought to cooperate with Dateline in the development of the story. However, Dateline's deceit in registering producers as Quixtar IBOs under false pretenses created suspicion on Quixtar's part that the story would not be a realistic depiction of its business. In addition, much of Dateline's "reporting" appeared to be lifted directly from the Web site of a Quixtar critic, who boasted online of his involvement in Dateline NBC's story.
Quixtar's management team also considered Dateline's record, including the infamous broadcast in which Dateline NBC rigged truck crashes. In late 1992, General Motors sued Dateline for defamation – the first defamation suit GM had ever filed. Dateline NBC apologized and admitted that using sparking devices to trigger a fire was a bad idea.
So, while Quixtar provided comprehensive written responses to Dateline in the hopes of creating greater awareness and understanding, it did not grant an interview. It was, and remains, our belief that Quixtar's perspective would be taken out of context to support Dateline's story line, regardless of the facts.
Dateline NBC has stated that because it provided the opportunity to be interviewed, and because they showed specific portions of letters Quixtar sent to them, they are not obligated to include a link to this response site at the Web site where the transcript of their story is shared publicly. And, despite Dateline claims of fair and balanced journalism, they continue to link to the Web site of the aforementioned Quixtar critic.